Curaatlas may use AI-assisted tools during parts of its editorial workflow. This page explains what that means, what AI may help with, and what it should not be used to decide.
Our position is simple: AI can support organization, drafting and consistency, but it cannot replace editorial responsibility, medical judgment or source review.
Curaatlas remains responsible for the content published on the site.
AI usage — transparent boundary
Curaatlas may use AI-assisted tools during research organization, drafting support, translation support, formatting, quality checks, code development and image-production workflows. AI assistance does not receive authorship, professional credentials or medical-review status.
Curaatlas Editorial remains responsible for deciding what is published, checking the page structure and sources, correcting errors and disclosing uncertainty. AI output must not be used to invent medical facts, prices, citations, provider rankings, patient experiences, professional credentials or claims of medical approval.
Some Curaatlas images may be AI-assisted or generated. They are educational editorial visuals, not photographs of actual patients or proof of a clinical result. Images that could convey anatomy, technique, devices or recovery information remain subject to a separate professional-review gate.
Use of AI does not replace qualified medical, legal, privacy or editorial review where such review is required.